Supreme Court justices on abortion, during confirmation and from the bench

Then “Considered one of the essential issues to bear in mind about Roe v. Wade is that it has been reaffirmed many occasions over the previous 45 years, as you already know, and most prominently, most significantly, reaffirmed in Deliberate Parenthood v. Casey in 1992.”

Deliberate Parenthood v. Casey reaffirmed Roe and did so by contemplating the stare decisis elements. So Casey now turns into a precedent on precedent. It’s not as whether it is only a run of the mill case that was determined and by no means been reconsidered.”

Now “Historical past helps take into consideration stare decisis, as I’ve checked out it, and the historical past of how the court docket’s utilized stare decisis, and if you actually dig into it, the historical past tells a considerably completely different story, I believe than is typically assumed. If you consider a few of the most essential instances, the most consequential instances on this Court’s historical past, there’s a string of them the place the instances overruled precedent.”


“When you’ve gotten these two pursuits at stake and each are essential, as you acknowledge, why ought to this Court be the arbiter, quite than Congress, the state legislatures, state supreme courts, the folks with the ability to resolve this?”

Justice Amy Coney Barrett

nominated by President Donald Trump and confirmed in 2020

Show More

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button