No 10 party inquiry will reveal ‘farcical’ culture, say Whitehall sources | Boris Johnson

An inquiry into lockdown events in Downing Road, which may decide the destiny of Boris Johnson, is predicted to put naked a “farcical” tradition of ingesting and impromptu socialising, with little oversight from senior officers, the Guardian understands.

Whitehall sources mentioned the investigation, overseen by the senior civil servant Sue Grey, was additionally prone to unearth different drinks occasions throughout authorities buildings as particular advisers and officers had been inspired to “come clear” about breaches of lockdown guidelines.

Grey’s report is being anxiously awaited by Conservative MPs, a few of whom have already known as for Johnson to resign after he was compelled to apologise for attending a “carry your individual booze” gathering within the No 10 backyard on 20 Could 2020 – claiming he believed it was a “work occasion”.

The prime minister’s destiny might now lie within the fingers of Grey, who is known to nonetheless be gathering proof amid claims from Labour that Johnson’s clarification and half-apology was unbelievable.


Johnson ducked out of a public engagement in Lancashire on Thursday after a detailed member of the family examined optimistic for Covid.

Whereas self-isolation for contacts of coronavirus instances is not obligatory, Johnson’s spokesman mentioned the prime minister would heed steerage to restrict exterior contacts as a lot as doable for seven days after the check.

“According to the steerage, he’s lowering contact. He’ll be working from No 10, doing every day exams and limiting contact with others each exterior No 10 and certainly inside No 10 as nicely,” they mentioned.

A number of Tory MPs, together with the party’s chief in Scotland, Douglas Ross, mentioned Johnson ought to resign instantly after he gave his account of the lockdown-busting drinks occasion.

It emerged on Thursday that Boris Johnson will not be concerned on this spring’s Scottish Conservative convention – an unprecedented snub for a UK chief of the party. A Scottish Tory supply mentioned: “I don’t see a manner he may very well be concerned actually.”

Few different MPs have up to now publicly joined Ross’s name for Johnson to go; however many at the moment are awaiting the findings of Grey’s investigation earlier than deciding whether or not they can proceed to again the prime minister.

Sources mentioned that Grey’s staff – based mostly within the Cupboard Workplace – was nonetheless gathering proof concerning the drinks events in Whitehall. These embody an alleged Christmas party and a Zoom quiz in December 2020, in addition to gatherings within the backyard on 15 and 20 Could.

Downing Street party claims: what May 2020 looked like for the rest of England – video
(*10*)Downing Road party claims: what Could 2020 appeared like for the remainder of England – video

It’s understood that the staff are inspecting the tradition and the administration constructions inside No 10. Sources mentioned the inquiry’s employees consider that No 10’s constructions are “farcical”.

The disclosures, which will name into query the administration of No 10 by Johnson and the cupboard secretary Simon Case, come as Johnson’s cupboard allies took to the airwaves to defend him.

The tradition secretary, Nadine Dorries, endorsed the concept the prime minister may not have truly carried out something incorrect, saying his apology had been over what the general public “perceived had occurred”.

She additionally argued that it was an excellent public well being determination to have used the Downing Road backyard for gatherings.

“I don’t settle for that he’s within the incorrect,” Dorries advised Sky Information. “What I assist the prime minister in is his apology. He mentioned very clearly that he understood the upset and the anger that folks felt at what they perceived had occurred, and what had been reported. However what all of us need is the inquiry to conclude.


Priti Patel, one other staunch Johnson loyalist, appeared to argue the occasion within the No 10 backyard had been a part of a “24/7 authorities working night time and day on the top of a pandemic”.

“He was thanking employees,” the house secretary advised Sky. “Let’s not neglect that was in Could 2020, on the time when there was numerous work.”

Grey’s inquiry will assess why nobody noticed match to cease the 20 Could gathering, after the prime minister’s principal non-public secretary, Martin Reynolds, despatched out an invite to employees to “socially distanced drinks”.

Among the many questions that will be requested is why nobody felt capable of “blow the whistle” on Reynold’s party invites, despite the fact that a number of folks believed that they broke Covid rules.

The report is predicted to put out a sequence of factual statements concerning the drinks events, when and the place they happened, how many individuals attended them, and, crucially, their goal. This will then be in contrast with the rules on the time.

In principle, Grey may advocate that Johnson is investigated underneath the ministerial code. But when she does so, Johnson must resolve whether or not to launch an inquiry into his personal alleged rule breaches.

The Metropolitan police confirmed in a press release that they’d not launch their very own investigation into occasions in Downing Road in Could 2020 until Grey discovered proof of rule-breaking.

“The Met has ongoing contact with the Cupboard Workplace in relation to this inquiry. If the inquiry identifies proof of behaviour that’s doubtlessly a legal offence it will be handed to the Met for additional consideration.”

One former cupboard minister recommended that even when the prime minister isn’t explicitly condemned in Grey’s report, Tory MPs may transfer in opposition to him, with key council elections looming. “We’re heading for an absolute hammering in Could. I feel colleagues will wish to act earlier than then,” they mentioned.

Grey’s appointment to go the inquiry got here amid a panicky ambiance in Downing Road, insiders declare. Case stood down in mid-December after allegations emerged of a drinks occasion happening inside his personal workplace.

A Tory adviser who attended conferences in Downing Road through the pandemic contrasted the lax Covid security regime within the constructing with the a lot more durable guidelines in place elsewhere throughout authorities that noticed many individuals working from house.

“In No 10 they had been advised they needed to be in: it was a completely totally different angle. That was why Covid ripped by way of that constructing. There was no testing, there have been no bubbles. You possibly can perceive why the party occurred whenever you perceive that broader tradition.”

One other senior Tory who beforehand labored in Downing Road mentioned opening a bottle of wine on the desk was common if folks had been working into the night, notably on a Friday.

Show More

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button