Fear and uploading in Singapore after OnlyFans creator charged over ‘obscene’ material | Singapore

“Technically, I’d guess that 80% of individuals are criminals based on that legislation since most of us have downloaded porn earlier than, or if you happen to’ve ever despatched a grimy pic to your accomplice, that too is against the law.”

One OnlyFans content material creator, who goes by the net deal with LucyToday, is among the many many in Singapore who concern what the long run holds after police determined to cost fellow creator and influencer Titus Low Kaide with transmitting what the police alleged had been “obscene supplies”. It’s the first time an OnlyFans creator has confronted prosecution in Singapore for sharing such content material by way of the platform, based on native media.

It’s had a chilling impact on the OnlyFans neighborhood, says LucyToday, whose posts embody nude photos and these of a sexual nature. “Myself and different content material creators are nervous.”

OnlyFans is a content material subscription service that permits creators to submit unique material of any style – together with music, artwork, meals in addition to grownup content material – whereas followers pay a month-to-month subscription to entry it. Launched in 2016, it has greater than 150 million registered customers, a few of whom had been a part of an inflow seen amid the pandemic as folks seemed for alternative routes to make cash.


Lucy was posting related content material on different websites free however joined OnlyFans in August final yr to monetise it. She says she’ll proceed to make use of the platform for now, hoping the federal government will change its “outdated and draconian legal guidelines”.

Onlyfans creator Titus Low, who has been charged in Singapore over the material on his account.
Onlyfans creator Titus Low, who has been charged in Singapore over the material on his account. {Photograph}: Titus Low/Youtube

Jada Saur, a content material creator from Canada who beforehand lived in Singapore, fears the stance taken by authorities might lower off a major revenue stream for a lot of customers. Saur joined OnlyFans initially of the pandemic and says the revenue from posting nude images and sexting will assist put her via performing faculty.

“It’s tremendous scary as a result of I feel lots of people are going to cease making OnlyFans content material,” Saur says, including that others may take steps to cover their identities on the positioning to keep away from prosecution.

Saur wonders if the explanation Low, 22, was focused when many others use the positioning is due to his creation of “guy-on-guy content material”. Homosexuality stays unlawful in Singapore.

A matter of consent

Low confronted a district court docket on 30 December final yr, charged below the nation’s Penal Code and Prison Process Code, which makes it unlawful to transmit any obscene supplies by digital means. He was accused of sharing specific images and movies in addition to failing to adjust to a police order to not entry his account.

If discovered responsible, Low might face jail time in addition to a number of fines.

In a video posted to his YouTube on Thursday, Low described his preliminary arrest, saying 5 law enforcement officials turned up at his home and confiscated his cellphone and all his on-line particulars.

OnlyFans was his fundamental supply of revenue earlier than the investigation, he says, and that it helped him escape a troublesome background. With out that revenue, he says he’s in “a decent spot”.

Low doesn’t know who filed the police report that led to the the fees however hopes the incident will “get folks fascinated about how inclusive our society is in 2022”.

Some, together with Low, have questioned the premise of the fees. “We don’t power you to look at our content material,” Low says. “It’s not open for public consumption.”

“I create particular content material for particular adults. We’re each prepared purchaser and vendor,” he provides.

view of singapore
Critics have stated Singapore’s legal guidelines are ‘outdated and draconian’ in the digital age. {Photograph}: Roslan Rahman/AFP/Getty Photographs

Shailey Hingorani, head of analysis and advocacy at ladies’s rights and gender equality group Conscious, agrees, given the photographs had been being shared consensually. “An knowledgeable and enthusiastic alternate is happening, and no one is being harm,” she says.


In the course of the subsequent Penal Code evaluation, Hingorani suggests “legal guidelines pertaining to sexual exercise of any nature needs to be relooked at to maintain up with society and know-how, with the precept of consent as a foundation to find out legality.”

Till then, Mission X, a nonprofit supporting intercourse employees in Singapore, says the transfer “has struck concern and panic in many grownup content material creators, who now fear that their livelihoods might be fully upended and their private liberty threatened.”

Show More

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Back to top button