The allegations that the Russian navy intelligence service, the GRU, provided bounties to Taliban-linked militants to goal U.S. and coalition forces in Afghanistan was first reported by The New York Instances in June.
Then-President Donald Trump initially known as the report a “hoax.” He mentioned intelligence officers instructed him he was not briefed about these allegations on the time as a result of they did not find them credible. Gen. Frank McKenzie, head of U.S. Central Command, said in September the intel nonetheless hadn’t been corroborated.
Within the March 1 letter, Duckworth pointed to public studies displaying doable proof that GRU bounty affords had been made, might have resulted in funds and should have “impressed or incentivized” lethal assaults in opposition to U.S. and coalition forces.
She went on to criticize the Trump administration for failing to present an official response to fundamental questions concerning the evaluation of the allegations, or whether or not any corroborating proof was discovered.
Duckworth applauded Biden for tasking Haines with reviewing alleged Russian exercise, together with the bounties program. As soon as this evaluate is full, Duckworth requests that the DNI put together an unclassified evaluation “that can present urgently wanted transparency on this grave matter.”
“I urge you to take motion the place the prior administration failed,” Duckworth wrote.
In December, then-national safety adviser Robert O’Brien briefed Trump on related allegations involving Chinese language operatives. Nonetheless, rumors that China secretly provided bounties to Afghan militants to kill U.S. troops had been thought of even much less credible than the knowledge on the Russian bounties, former and present protection officers instructed POLITICO.