A moral victory: what the acquittal of the Colston Four means for future protests | News

Final week, 4 Black Lives Matter protesters who tore down of a statue in Bristol of the infamous slave dealer Edward Colston had been acquitted of all fees. The 4 left Bristol crown courtroom in jubilant temper, having argued of their defence that they had been on ‘the proper facet of historical past’.

Sage Willoughby, one of the 4 defendants, tells Nosheen Iqbal that the day the statue got here down is all a blur for him, however that he is aware of what he did was proper. All 4 of the defendants accepted their involvement in flattening the statue, however argued efficiently that that they had acted in a simply approach, such was the egregious nature of Colston’s involvement in the slave commerce, and that the statue’s continued existence in the centre of Bristol was grossly offensive.

The Guardian’s Damien Gayle was in courtroom for the trial and describes a case through which David Olusoga, an eminent historian of slavery, was referred to as for the defence. However the response to the verdict has been polarised, with many main Conservatives criticising the consequence as a ‘vandals constitution’.


Sage Willoughby, Jake Skuse, Milo Ponsford and Rhian Graham celebrate after receiving a not guilty verdict at Bristol crown court

{Photograph}: Finnbarr Webster/Getty Photos


Help The Guardian

The Guardian is editorially impartial.
And we wish to maintain our journalism open and accessible to all.
However we more and more want our readers to fund our work.

Support The Guardian

Show More

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button